test
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
barking moonbat Comedy crazy pete embryonic stem cell fun video hate mail imao keith olbermann mu mypetjawa new video patdollard republicans smashes zo
“The Dark Pelosi” (With Waterboarding!)
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!Related posts:
I’d like to see the progressive face change for her like they do for MJ.. I honestly think she has probably had more work done, and she cheaped out because she looks like a freak!!
I’m gonna have nightmares after your Nancikins impressions. Oh the horror. Oh the horror!
a) the CIA isn’t the military
b) the military does as it’s told. End of story.
c) nothing I have read anywhere, other then by pundits, would give any credibility to the claim that water boarding is anything but torture.
Who cares if waterboarding is torture??? I don’t. These scum terrorists are trying to kill us…what a MORON.
a) you have absolutely no understanding of basic concepts of US Law.
b) no credible source says that torture yields reliable intelligence.
c) most people held in US custody can not be called a terrorist by any meaningful definition of the word. Even if they are terrorist, that is for a court to decide, not anyone who is a member or answers to a member of the executive branch of government. Reference, your complete ignorance of the basic concepts of US Law.
d) you’re a blathering retard.
I Agree. I don’t care and i don’t know anyone who does.
Just curious, but what exactly are you talking about?
“US Law”? You mean the Constitution? Terrorists are not protected by the Constitution, and the Executive reserves the right to identify those who are captured on foreign battlefields, fight for no formal army, and pose a threat to the Republic as enemy combatants. They may detain those enemy combatants until the end of the hostilities. It is completely legal.
Yes, of course they must be tried; no argument there; but we are not required to try them until the end of the conflict. The Bush Administration set the military tribunals in motion, and were widely condemned by the international community even though they were abiding by the law. Again, the Constitution does not apply here; Foreigners captured on foreign soil, and held outside the mainland? Come on.
the US Supreme Court has recently ruled that they do in fact have jurisdiction in defacto US territory (Gitmo). If they didn’t, it’d still go against the spirit of the US constitution. And no, Bush wasn’t abiding by the law, he was just committing his crimes in Gitmo since until recent case law the jurisdiction of the courts there was ambiguous. per the Geneva convention combatants captured within the nation to which they are a national are protected.